fix: attribute descriptive review gaps to the named evidence target

backend/wisegrade/scoring.py

@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor, as_completed
+import re
 
 from sqlalchemy import and_, or_, select, update
 
@@ -258,8 +259,13 @@ def _score_criterion(db, batch, project, criterion, client, *, retriever, multi_
     if result.score is None:
         # The retrieval found body pages but the model judged them insufficient.
         score.status, score.error = STATUS_NEEDS_REVIEW, "模型认为现有正文证据不足以判断该项，转教师复核。"
+        # Models normally write "误差分析（t1）：缺少…", not just the bare
+        # label. Attribute those explanations to their target instead of marking
+        # every target as missing. Unknown explanations remain conservative.
         declined = [target for target in targets if target["use"] == USE_CONTENT and
-                    (not result.missing_evidence or target["label"] in result.missing_evidence)]
+                    any(target["label"] in note or re.search(
+                        r"(?<![A-Za-z0-9_])" + re.escape(target["target_id"]) + r"(?![A-Za-z0-9_])", note)
+                        for note in result.missing_evidence)]
         _record_evidence_gaps(score, declined or [target for target in targets if target["use"] == USE_CONTENT])
         for gap in score.evidence_gaps:
             gap["reason"] = result.reason